Welcome.

[HR]

There really is no obvious way to introduce something as heavy as what 2EQ defines, so what you will see here is just my most recent essay, posted here temporarily, until it is replaced before long with my next one. But hopefully they all go some way towards sketching out the broad framework for you.

To get you started here, maybe take a look at THIS

That is just one example chosen almost at random, but I do love this guy, and nothing I say below should overshadow that sentiment. But there is a problem here.

There are some people who will look at that and immediately leap for joy in the belief that what is being explained there is true, and that this is all about to happen exactly as indicated. Others will simply scoff at such claims, proclaiming them to be just one more example of mystical and spiritualised BS.

It sounds wonderful, but how to make sense of all that? What does it all mean really? Some kind of great collective awakening? To what exactly? And how?

But I am not going to say that it isn't true, not in essence. That is not the issue at all. What he is saying there may be entirely correct, at least from a certain point of view.

The potential 'transformation' being described there really is possible, another entire state really is available to the average person, this is precisely what 2EQ means. Stable equilibriums for every individual, even though the second one is rarely experienced at this time in history. It is even possible that it might be made broadly available to many people for the first time as indicated. But not currently - not in the form being outlined there. At present that simply isn't available, and not because I am doubting the claim. It is not available because making it accessible in that widespread sense is only something that will occur once the true nature of that shift has been sufficiently understood by at least a few, and if that insight is then deployed at a collective level.

So is this essential understanding available at this point? No. Not as far as I know. And likewise with the reliable propagation of that 'release event' in the individual, to see evidence for that would be wonderful, so please let me know if ever you think that is occurring anywhere. That would mean I could relax, and not need to say any of this. Heaven. But I certainly haven't seen anything like that yet.

In the simplest sense, if you don't grasp this entire possibility in the correct terms, then -

First of all you won't be able to facilitate that transition on any reliable or cascading basis.
Secondly you won't be able to appropriately explain it, even if you do manage it occasionally.

This is what changes when you plug in this missing piece. The moment the true problem is defined, only then will we be able to offer the true solution - one that is not only able to reliably facilitate that shift in people, but also reliably explain what it all means without any need to leap to all manner of spiritualism or mystical jargon.

The true explanation will indeed begin to produce implementable changes that immediately cascade in the sense being indicated, that is the difference. That's what not having this critical anatomy means - it means hit and miss at best. It will never be reliable until a very firm grasp is gained regarding the underlying anatomy associated. But the moment you add that, suddenly you get the possibility of a spiralling event that is also fully explained in rational empirical terms, thus laying the firm foundations of an enlightened rational culture. We are going to need new terms in order to account for new phenomena. There is a need for a deep paradigm shift.

Something important was overlooked, and remains overlooked even now. The essence of that missing information has now been reduced down to a core insight that rests at the centre of 2EQ as a paradigm. So our task here will be to remedy this issue, by first of all explaining what is missing, and by then providing it.

Actually, the personal 'transformation' being indicated there, and in many other places, is not the attainment of anything - it is the relinquishment of something. In particular, it is the final unraveling of a vast body of internal activity, which is why the aim is always stillness. It is not as if 'stillness' is an attainment after all, even a rock can do that. But in this instance the stillness associated is just what remains once we stop 'achieving' this other thing that has been running non-stop in the background for our entire lives.

To be clear, however, the activity that is 'removed' in this instance is not only in the mind. It may not even be active at all, at least not necessarily. It might merely be an imbalance in many instances, or a blockage.

The target of this relinquishment is a sprawling complex of subversive motivation and disruption that all has a singular function at its root. It is intended to be very stable, very dynamic, and very powerful - but most especially it is almost impossible to see. And this is not surprising after all, given that concealment is its very purpose for existing.

So what does this mean? It means that the possibility being indicated above is entirely real, but that it remains very unlikely that it is going to be broadly delivered in the sense being indicated there. Not yet.

It could be, don't get me wrong. That is the whole thrust of what this emerging anatomy indicates. But I believe that anatomy is largely missing in this instance, which will inevitably have serious downstream consequences in practice.

The point being - if you don't have a very clear definition of the overall nature and functioning of this concealed event then rooting it out can be very difficult indeed. I am tempted to say impossible, at least in any broadly accessible sense. And this is why I doubt the claim in the message above. I think that is entirely possible, but unless they have somehow stumbled upon this missing framework - and in the process completely inverted their basic worldview - then achieving that seems unlikely.

It might actually be possible to achieve this transition without the correct understanding associated. After all, we do occasionally see a few rare people find their way free of it. So yes, maybe, but not in any truly stable or upwardly spiralling way. That seems unlikely, as I say, especially when you get to see what is really going on beneath.

In many ways it might even be regrettable if that did occur, in that successful practice without accurate theory would only tend to falsely validate a worldview that places a very important picture in the wrong frame. The potential being indicated was never spiritual. It has only been misunderstood by science, but that might be about to change. .

Once you see what is really going on, much of this becomes clear. The important functional framework, and the necessary terms in which it must be rendered, really only fit within a broader context of scientific thinking about the nature of things. It fits easily with evolution, and requires no mysticism at all. Which is fortunate. Many people will resist any kind of spiritual mumbo jumbo, and perhaps rightly so. But it is possible they will not be so resistant to a scientific claim, especially one that has very high efficacy when applied in practice.

So what is 2EQ saying? Perhaps we could go back a little bit. Can we put it in a nutshell?

These days there is a lot of talk about consciousness, and although that is not a core consideration of 2EQ, it might still be a good place to begin.

I assume you are here? Something is happening? Yes. At least we can agree on this much.

But as for the details, things start to get a bit more murky. Consciousness remains something of an enigma, and we see a kind of tug of war throughout culture at this point in time, with one group seeking to make consciousness an emergent phenomena, and another claiming it as the root and origin of all things. And lots of variations in between. It is a bit of a mess, and at this point nobody can really agree. But certain things can already be known with some degree of certainty, and at least science is starting to ask the right questions at last.

So what can we know for sure? Firstly, consciousness - at least as we know it - appears to be associated with certain complex neurological functions in the brain. It is anchored in physical reality in a way that seems to find more of it piling up wherever we see more of a particular type of cognitive sophistication. In other words, whether or not brains produce consciousness, or collect it, or channel it from the 9th dimension - the more advanced the brain, the more consciousness seems to be present. And this matters if only because of the way we will tend to want to separate consciousness from physical states, for reasons we will see. That impulse becomes deeply suspect within the 2EQ framework, and also fails to account for the rather obvious fact that a great deal of conscious experience is generated by the mind.

This is the other thing we can know about consciousness as we experience it - that it certainly implies or involves various types of illusion. A great deal of what is 'experienced' consciously appears to be merely part of some grand simulation we are running at every moment - a kind of navigational program in that sense - and largely built from pure imagination.

Whether or not this 'experience' turns out to be real, it is at least supposed to feel real, and by no accident it seems.

Consciousness, whatever it turns out to be ultimately, in our case appears to emerge as part of a far wider process of activity that is geared around navigating our way - as complex organisms - through an equally complex and shifting environment. And an essential element in this recipe seems to be an intentional capacity to experience both joy and pain.

There are even those who claim that consciousness is an illusion in its entirety, that it is merely the product of this articulated sense of separate self, but from a direct experiential point of view this is hard to hold up. For the 'conscious subject' conscious experience is the most real and important thing of all, it is really all that matters. And I have to assume that a conscious subject is who I am speaking to here.

In any case, this is the position we need to start off from. We are conscious, and we have inner lives, regardless of how they are constructed. And so it is within that context that we need to ask all of the most important questions.

So far so good. Every sparrow, every mouse, and every other sentient species are no doubt all in the same basic position.

But here we see the issue arising. We remain uniquely discontent, and this leads us into searching. We seek more, we look for better, and reach higher. Somehow this isn't enough. And this is the same basic impetus we see expressed in the video above. We are, as whole beings, forever seeking deeper wholeness. It implies that something is missing.

But actually, this is backwards, and that is what 2EQ will seek to make plain. The entire thing has been viewed upside down in a sense. What has previously been viewed as a gain is actually a loss.

So let's examine the whole thing from another perspective, just to see how this might better fit the picture we see -

Here is the mistake: What we imagine is only a single thing is actually two things.

The conscious experience we know is resting upon an emotional and psychological foundation that is in reality composed of two separate and competing events, both caught in a kind of perpetual struggle for power. And we are not speaking of anything as simple minded as good or evil etc, but a far more complex dance of energy and motivation.

A functional crisis has emerged in our case, an inevitable one in a sense, but one that has also resulted in the uniform generation of a secondary body of activity within the typical human motivational core - a program running alongside our main program so to speak, one that has a very defined purpose and structure, and that is also intrinsically concealed from view.

Think of all those stories about a 'government within the government', or conspiracy theories about some covert elite who secretly control everything. Think about our fears that AI will go crazy and want to kill us all in some deluded attempt to protect itself.

This is all just autobiographical gossip. These are not things going on out there in the world somewhere, they are things going on within us. It's just that all this twisted activity is concealed, and so - to whatever degree we still sense it at all - we tend to project it outwards.

In particular, this undertow of subversive activity is actually a secondary response. It is a kind of 'covering up', and 'breaking apart', a 'hiding away'. That is just the clean up crew, not the real party. The true event at the root of all this trouble is rarely experienced directly in adulthood, and that is how we know this covert agenda is working. It's job is to make sure we never get near it.

So what is that core event? For most people this is now latent, like a dormant volcano, but in its original raw form it makes for quite a show.

This aspect requires a full context to be established if we are going to understand it in detail, but we can scratch out an outline here.

What we see in modern humans, due to a recent convergence of developments, is a series of functional capacities that - when combined - have a tendency to produce a very dramatic result.

In particular, the emergence of 'self' as a simulated point of reference becomes embedded as a felt reality at a deep emotional level, thereby leading to a functional loop the moment the imminent reality of death is presented to the system.

The result of this is that it sets up an explosive potential for emotional deadlock, existential fear essentially, which - in order to keep functioning in any kind of normal way with a positive internal experience of life - then demands the emergence of a convoluted process of containment and management that is charged with the perpetual avoidance of this particular 'catastrophic' outcome.

Like I said, it seems a little complex, and it is.

This outline doesn't really do it justice. We are basically on fire, a fire that is fanned by awareness itself, so even looking in this direction will tend to produce quite negative emotional reactions. That is the very function of this subversive event. And you may already be experiencing this here. This is the ultimate hot potato in that sense, as we will see.

The mechanisms this 'secondary' body of unconscious activity can then employ as it seeks to perpetually contain this 'unexploded bomb' in the emotional core are many and varied, as defined by the complex anatomy of the system associated.

And this variation in the way it is managed in turn accounts for the vast divergence in the apparent motivations and psychological styles we see in people. It is as if we see a thousand different colours and shapes of peacock when we examine typical psychology, but when we pluck them all in the way 2EQ allows for what we are actually left with is the same bird underneath all of that. And this is important because of the way it points to an underlying unity. What we might think of as fundamental differences are in most cases just surface level affectations, and not who we really are at all.

The result of this 'mixed' state, where we have these two events unconsciously intertwined, is what we would generally call 'typical humanity'. And in this sense the entire world we see today is a situation that is actually being defined not by one psychological agenda, but by two.

First of all there is the base program so to speak, and at that level we are advanced primates, displaying all the motivational characteristics associated. But then there is this added activity, with its singular clandestine purpose being expressed in countless different ways, as defined by countless different situations. And this makes us something else again, monsters in a sense. We are not homo sapiens at all.

The purpose of this added activity is not intrinsically malicious, but due to the integrity of the system needing to be subverted at every moment, the inevitable result is that a price will be paid. The result is a very deep and perplexing process of struggle and limitation, a dynamic and shifting wrestle for control, and all of this occurring down below the level of conscious awareness. All we know is that life is hard, and that something is missing, something just isn't right, but no matter where we look we can't figure out what it is.

But as we have seen, nothing is missing from this picture at all - something very dramatic was added. And this is what I mean about this whole thing being upside down.

So when you begin to consider the implications of removing this massive submerged event from the unconscious, and what that might mean, it is pointless to view that in terms of the positivity being gained. That explains nothing. After all, you do not 'get' something in this shift, you 'lose' something. Does that make sense? It was just that what is removed is currently so ubiquitous that it is present in all people, and that has never been clearly identified. People don't even know it is there, let alone how big it is, so they have no way to conceive of what it might be like to lose it.

Several things stand out as being important here. Firstly, this added activity represents a powerful explanation for typical human psychology and behaviour, and in the process resolves many longstanding philosophical conundrums. But most importantly it shifts the entire orientation of life away from one of outward acquisition or experience to one of inward exploration and insight. And then, on the basis of that understanding, to sit about undertaking certain very dramatic manipulations.

We basically didn't know it was there - not as a separate and distinct added event - and most especially that it might be removed and undone under certain (currently rare) circumstances. It is a bombshell in this sense.

So does this emerging view fit what we see? Sure. It certainly explains in great detail the typical messy conflict that is the common emotional life. It explains the full range of motivations we see in a typical person, using a single dynamic model, and in the process redefines common psychology as not quite being what we imagined it was, and in particular that there was something that we missed. In this way it explains the rule, which is most people, but on the other hand it also explains the exception, where we occasionally see the arising of a completely different psychological state, and what appears to be a completely different motivational framework.

In short, it explains that everything outlined in that video above might be entirely real, but only from a very particular perspective, and only under certain conditions.

What 2EQ is basically proposing is that the removal of this sprawling and previously unnoticed body of subversive activity, in the singular and unequivocal manner the theory predicts, is what has historically been named 'spiritual enlightenment'. And if this is true then it means that this state is both entirely real, but also that it has been very dramatically misrepresented over time. With the best of intentions of course, but it remains true nevertheless - what it really is has been deeply misunderstood.

Beyond that, however, it also means - based on this emerging anatomy - that 'spiritual enlightenment' might indeed be made reliably accessible to all people over time, once the complex dynamics associated with this underlying event have been sufficiently penetrated by at least a few very smart people. But you really would need to add this bit of missing information, and to begin to see the whole thing up the other way. And I'm not sure that's what we see there yet.

More importantly, and assuming for a moment that this is broadly correct, the implications of what this actually means should not be understated. The practical implications, both for individual happiness as well as the collective as a whole, could be far more dramatic than previously understood.

In particular, the broadly cascading possibility being indicated above becomes a very real potential in the wake of finally grasping what is really going on beneath the surface, and in the right terms. But without such insight that would appear to be unlikely - in the same way as you don't see the Indian space agency shooting rockets into space using kundalini energy. They use rocket fuel just like everyone else.

It is a functional reality, not a mystical or religious state. What it actually is happens to be far more practical than it is spiritual. It only feels spiritual from a subjective point of view, in the same way as chemical compounds like DMT might feel spiritual, but we always need to remember just how much of what we experience consciously is arising based on our own simulation of reality, rather than being reality itself.

This is what happens when we turn all of this upside down as we are doing, suddenly the subjective experience comes to be seen as downstream from the real functions that are driving the whole event.

From this perspective, you also come to see that if all you ever do is maintain that direct perceptual vantage point, you will forever be lost in the trap we are defining here, if only because the conscious level of life is being intentionally excluded. So you need to go deeper, and adopt a different approach.

Things always need to be understood in the terms in which they actually consist, and in this instance those terms are structural and functional. They are complex and dynamic. But one thing they are not is mystical, not in essence, at least not insofar as this particular transition is concerned. It might feel like that, certainly, but actually what is really going on can be understood in relatively mundane terms. I don't mean simplistic terms, but more in the sense that you might understand an ecosystem, and all the various complicated dynamics associated.

Finally, what this emerging framework does very clearly is that it places all of this within the reach of just a small and dedicated few. The nature of the situation means that the essential anatomy required to undo all of this trouble in the individual (with collective support) was merely concealed, not even that difficult, and that exposure of the path associated might therefore happen quite suddenly.

The basic framework being explained here lays out something that nobody even knew was there, at least not in these terms.

It is all about the scale of the event being indicated, and how near it all is to being unleashed, and in a way that will be essentially unstoppable right from the start.

This is the essence of 'capture', as we might define it here, which is the moment you truly grasp what all of this means for the first time. You can see a post about this here, along with just how difficult it can be to truly grasp it without at least a bit of help. And this is why I have recently started talking to people about it, rather than writing, although not with just anyone. We have had to become very selective, for reasons that might be becoming obvious.

It turns out that this paradigm flip comes at a cost, and here we see the rub. We were looking in the wrong direction. All of this was not hidden in the light. It would have been discovered centuries ago if that was the case. It was all hidden in the darkest corner, where nobody ever goes. But isn't that always the way?

This is what it means for the true problem to be a presence, rather than an absence. It means that in order to find the light we are seeking we will need to go through the darkness we have been avoiding. At least temporarily.

But here is the real key to all of it, and the thing we need to linger on - what we see here is a situation where just a few very brave people might be able to enter that space and map it all out for all of us, thereby building roads and highways through what was previously an untamed wilderness.

The point being - the moment they do, and the moment the insights associated are able to be implemented in some kind of practical sense as an accessible application of some kind, we will see the floodgates open on a process of collective change the likes of which the world has never seen.

Crucially, however - all of this will come from just a few people, not from the many. And it will also come out of the darkness, not out of the light. But most importantly of all, it will impact all people everywhere, not just a select few as they are indicating there. Like a kind of wildfire, it will be completely out of control right from the start, and it won't die down again until the entirety of human suffering has been swept away into ash. It is a far greater claim in this sense than even those seemingly absurd assertions we see above.

So how can we make sense of the claims in the video, and elsewhere, regarding this transformative potential? What does that look like if you use 2EQ as a vantage point?

Does it seem possible that they have stumbled upon this missing anatomy there?

Somehow I doubt it. It would be awesome for all of us if they had, but unfortunately the particular strengths associated with that path are rare - a capacity to confront and overcome this activity within yourself is obviously essential. And you really need to be looking in the right direction in the first place, and I haven't noticed anyone who is doing that.

And yet, it is actually possible, especially if you are speaking about only a very receptive cohort. After all, we do already see a rare individual find this state without any help at all, and with seemingly no theoretical context to guide them. I have even seen that myself. So in any context where enough practical modalities have been accumulated, each selected solely on the basis of whatever observable effect they have, you will indeed approach a point where a very suitable individual might transition across the threshold 2EQ so clearly defines, and thereby stimulate the cascading release of this concealed internal event. They will be liberated in this sense. And that is real.

So could it happen? Sure. It could happen. It could even be that this is what they are referring to - perhaps they see evidence for this already, emerging out of their valiant efforts to make this state available to all.

But will that be what 2EQ is talking about? No. Here we see another level again being indicated.

Instead of this potential of 'entering the light' being made accessible to just a few very highly prepared people, on a somewhat unreliable basis, and within a theoretical context that does not really understand it in any concrete way - what we see here is the possibility of just a few very highly qualified people being prepared to 'penetrate the darkness' instead, thereby making that transition into the light accessible to everyone, and within a theoretical context that not only grasps it fully but that also happens to directly fit with everything we currently understand from a purely scientific point of view.

So that is still awesome, don't get me wrong. If they really have managed to get any level of propagating transformation working in that sense then that is a magnificent achievement.

But that is not it. That is not the big noise. That is only an appetizer in the wider context. The real event is bigger than that, and will only arise on the basis of a very different type of approach, as indicated.

It is all about this paradigm flip, and about having the right information, in the right terms. The moment you have the right foundations down, along with a few people brave enough to venture forth and take a closer look, suddenly the sort of widespread liberation being indicated there not only becomes possible, but in some sense inevitable. And even if anyone did manage to stimulate this cascading release with a few people prior to having the theoretical aspect sorted out, the result would only be that this flip would occur regardless before long, as the sheer weight of realisation eventually brought to the fore what was really going on. But that would be backwards once again, like diving into the swimming pool first and putting the water in later. And that's why I felt compelled to write this. It could be that there are some people out there who are not only interested in what was proposed there, but who might be interested in something far deeper again.

What they indicate there is beautiful, like a dolphin, but it is implied there that not everyone will be included. And in real world terms probably only very few will, unless they really have cracked a reliable process based solely on practical feedback. Whereas what 2EQ is pointing at is more like the equivalent of a blue whale - it is the biggest thing ever, and won't merely be fumbling around in the dark.

It will have clear foundations, and everyone will be impacted by the results, if only because development based on the correct foundations will be an upwardly spiralling event. Science will own it.

I first indicated this cascading possibility in a book named Organic Psychology as far back as 2001, and again ten years later in another one called Scientific Enlightenment. But in those days I was completely unaware of just how much personal immunity I had built up over time, in relation to this underlying event. I had no idea that there would only be so few who would be able to look, and even fewer who would be able to understand, and yet fewer again who would be prepared to act. There seems to be a combination of very high intelligence, high self reflection, high baseline honesty, high emotional strength, high social independence, etc … all rolled into one. Not everyone is ready to go upstream in this sense, into the very deep jungle.

I really had no idea. And so it was that I made some huge mistakes. With the entire weight of impetus associated with what turns out to literally be a world breaking possibility, I ended up throwing myself against a concrete wall for years, until my entire life was destroyed. I was wrecked - personally, socially, financially, physically, perhaps even spiritually. I was being driven by an impulse to release the deepest suffering there is, and at the widest possible level, a possibility that also turns out to be entirely real. But I had no idea at all that most people wouldn't qualify for that initial stage, which meant that I only ever confronted what I perceived to be abject weakness and stupidity, not to mention personal attack and judgement. I really had no idea that the single most important but of information on the planet might be perceived by most people as being so completely obnoxious.

If I had been prepared to simply give up on people, and to accept the world as it is, then there would have been no problem. But I am nothing if I am not tenacious. And this leaves us with a kind of paradox.

I absolutely fucking hate people now. They are just so incredibly and unforgivably dumb. And with so much on the line, this consistent failure seems to me to be just so completely reprehensible.

But of course, this is not actually true. I am simply very committed to a very particular outcome being reached, one that just happens to demand a certain level of input from any others associated. So whenever that level is not met, which in most cases it isn't, I really have nothing to say. I am simply very focused, and the demands of the path associated have meant I have had to let everything else go.

The upside is easy. And that's what we see above. You just follow the light, and enjoy the path. But that will only take you so far in this instance, given that all the real solutions can only be found in the real problem. And the real problem is dark as hell. So that is the downside, the dark path, and the torture associated. None of which would matter, except for the recent discovery that the essential core of all this can only be carried over in conversation, rather than in writing.

Once again, you will see this outlined here, as well as in several of the latest works.

What does it mean? It means that it is all here if you want it, the real answer to the questions posed in the video above, but that you are going to have to come and get it from me directly. And do you think I like that fact? No. I basically wrote an entire book trying to figure out a way to avoid this possibility, but at this point not a single person has ever reached this point of 'capture' on their own, merely by listening or reading about all of this, whereas so far 100% of those who have taken the time to actually speak to me have been able to come to this point of clarity. But as I said above, we have had to become very selective in this regard.

Strangely, it is not even that dark, not really. It is just a system, like any other system. There is no need to freak out, or to take it all personally. And this is why we need to be speaking to adults now.

But yes, this will be the true cost here. It seems unavoidable. If what has been suggested above really is going to occur as defined, the true nature of the situation is going to need to be explored and explained first. At least a few people will need to go into that dark corner in order to make the light available to all.

In any case, that is what 2EQ is all about. If you would like to know what it is, and how it works, I am happy to explain. But at this stage what this really means is a kind of 'guided tour', which is only being made available to a select few, for reasons that will be explained in what follows. Unless you would like to pay for my time. But for now, this offer will only be free if you have been directly invited by someone involved.

In particular there is this one part you simply cannot skip, at least for the moment, and you will find that outlined in the shallow end INVITE document, so that is where you will need to begin.

You simply must have this ‘orientation’ chat with me before you go too far up this tree, if you are not going to completely waste your time here. So you can consume all manner of introductions and primers etc, as you will see listed below in various forms, or perhaps see the NEW PRIMERS for the most recent iterations, but sooner or later you will need to heed the warning just offered and take that plunge with me. You would certainly be wasting your time reading any of the big books prior to doing that. They will all just go straight over your head in that case.

In the meantime there is really only one thing we need to be focused on here, which is to prepare the way for a far bigger event when the applications arrive rather suddenly at some point. With this in mind this website is just kind of a placeholder at this early stage, a blank slate, an empty stage upon which all manner of things might emerge over time. The show has yet to begin, and only you can say what it will become in that regard. Feel free to login and have your say.

Until then, and if you would like a peek at what is coming, you might start off with a few of the older resources available at this point -

• The Wonky Weeble (the simplest overview of what 2EQ is all about). (free video)

• The Snapshot Overview from Something Else (a first attempt to capture the shallow end chat sequence in writing) (free audio)

• Deep End Epilogue from Something Else (explaining the stages) (free audio)

• The Easy Book (paid audio)

• The Hard Book (the ‘Magnum Opus’ of 2EQ - several candidates being discussed, some already published as indicated below)

For further orientation about what - and who - this forum is for, you might also see some of the items linked from some of the posts in the Orientation and Resources sections.

Several books can also be found here in print copy and eBook formats. But as I say, if you have not already read the INVITE then you will basically be wasting your time with all of that. The books will be like locks with no keys. These books are in most cases also only early unedited manuscripts, and will no doubt be significantly tidied up before long, so if you want to get one in its original raw state then now would be the time.

Overall, the purpose of this website is not to broadly promote the paradigm associated - it is simply not that sort of thing. This is not a social movement, it is not a club to belong to, it is not even a philosophy to adopt. There is nothing to believe here.

Only a few will need to know all of this in order to make the insights available in practical form to everyone. And yet, those few will indeed need to know, and with that in mind we are doing everything we can here to prepare the way for them.

Please be aware, however - and as we have hopefully already indicated here throughout - that some people are always going to find the subject matter more than a little challenging, in which case some sort of negative reaction can be expected. Apart from anything else 2EQ is a very fierce mirror, and some people simply don't like that sort of thing.

With all of this in mind, it might eventually be necessary to approve all posts - leaving them in a moderation queue by default. That would be regrettable, but I suppose we will find out before long. We will start by leaving the General Forum open and see how it goes.

We remain open to any suggestions.

HR

PS - no real names please.