Start Here.
-
Welcome to 2EQ. For a brief outline of what this is all about you might see HERE for a podcast overview of the whole paradigm, and follow on from there to see a few deeper explorations, or simply jump directly into chatting with one of the new AI MODELS.
So what is 2EQ? What is it all about? And where does it currently stand?
The central tenet of the paradigm is the existence within all people of a kind of complex subversion, a bug in our software so to speak, and that this added burden is the true root cause of a great deal of suffering and confusion. But that is not the big news, that much has already been empirically validated in rigorous scientific studies (see TMT), although their understanding of the true nature of that hidden event is being somewhat updated here.
Several important factors become important here right at the start -
The first is that this underlying event is very well hidden, and not only passively. Concealment is its very purpose for existing, and in order to achieve this function it must also conceal its own existence from conscious awareness.
The second thing to know, and far more significant, is that this entire body of activity is singular in origin, and not intrinsic to us, which implies that it can be removed. The whole thing, once.
The significance of this revelation - if true - is difficult to overstate. Especially once you get to see the full range and scope of all the various forms this dynamic activity can assume, and just how much conflict and pain it generates. The ability to reliably resolve it in a single sweeping action would be a bombshell, especially if that possibility became widely available in the wake of such developments. So this becomes the focus of 2EQ, for obvious reasons. In terms of all the various types of personal change we might see mapped out in different psychological theories, the potential being indicated is basically a supernova by comparison. It points to a singular and profound transition to another entirely different state, another second stable equilibrium, hence the name 2EQ. And it also indicated a kind of socially transmitted wave of emancipation the moment this possibility becomes reliably accessible at an individual level for the first time, which we generally refer to as the 'great cascade'. Finally, as a kind of cherry on the top, the originating spark of that epic spiral of development and transformation appears to rest within the easy reach of just a small and dedicated few.
Unfortunately, however, the second thing just indicated above also happens to be blocked by the first thing outlined there - the blindness generated by the activity itself is what prevents this great wave of change from being initiated, if only because it makes talking about it almost impossible. And even if you do manage to bring it up, nobody will understand what you are saying. The whole thing will just get washed away like building a sandcastle below the tide line.
This is the central bind of 2EQ. It is all about overcoming this very deep aversion in order to reveal a simple but profoundly significant underlying reality, and an even more significant potential. It is a battle between exposure and concealment, with a huge amount at stake.
This explains the path it has taken, and the barrier confronted. For years it remained deadlocked as a result of this mysterious incomprehension in the audience, at least in any written form. And in person it was generally worse, given how mysteriously hostile people tended to become whenever you start poking around this hidden wound at the core of life.
All of which begins to explain where the whole thing had remained hidden all this time, along with what finding it was always going to take. It is even possible that it has been found many times before, but that nobody who found it ever managed to survive the journey from discovery to delivery. Although, given how deeply concealed it was, it is also possible that this is the first time the central anatomy has been captured in this way - within a scientific and rational framework.
In any case, the result of this need to communicate what had been found in some broadly accessible manner, in the face of this equally deep and pervasive back-pressure at both an individual and cultural level, has resulted in a kind of endurance race, a battle to the death in a sense. Every bit of added forward momentment was always going to come at the cost of an unavoidable degree of social or emotional torture, due to forever poking people in their deepest wound, with the result being that as the message went up, the individual delivering that message would inevitably go down. And over time this would not be sustainable.
The question, then, becomes - will they make it to the important threshold before they perish? Can anybody swim that far underwater, on a single breath? And how to prevent yourself from being turned dark by all the venom and abrasion? As they say - "Too much sacrifice makes a stone of the heart".
Here we see the essential path taken, and the costs associated. And we are indicating all of this here if only because this has quite suddenly shifted. Previously, there had been a quite recent transition from writing about all of this, to speaking about it directly with people, in light of the discovery that in conversation it was relatively easy to bring anyone to the essential moment of 'capture', where suddenly the whole thing fell into place for them, and where the emotional aversion also spontaneously fell away. But still, that had its problems, if only because of how turbulent such dialogue might be for anyone delivering such insight, and also for anyone receiving such. It was effective when it could happen safely, but still wasn't scalable in any reliable sense, which meant it remained largely unsustainable at a time when resources were really starting to run short. There were a few glimmers of hope, where the right level of conversation seemed achievable, but in the end they never panned out. The whole event was inevitably going to fail.
It was a devastating realisation, especially once you see the scale and nature of what is being indicated here. To have come so far, and to have paid such a deep price, but to not quite make it - was absolutely shattering. And this could be precisely where humanity has been stuck for all this time. It could be because nobody who ever chased this particular elephant ever came back, and now we see why. Even being prepared to die for it wouldn't help. No person is without limits, and it is possible that this beast is simply too big for any individual to bring down on their own.
It's just very unfortunate - but perhaps also inevitable in a sense - that the brightest thing of all was hidden in the darkest place imaginable. And what I didn't understand until far too late was that I have become immune to that venom over time, when apparently others have not. So I could never figure out why people would keel over in that strange way, long before I ever got to the good part.
Really, I'm not sure if this is even making any sense here. It sounds simple at first glance, but I dare you to try it. Well, actually you could probably do that quite easily now, with the help of these new AI models, that's sort of the point here - but previously this was all but impossible.
Perhaps picture this mythical scenario -
You meet a wolf at the park, and in conversation you discover that the wolf is planning to run off and eat your family - at which point it disappears into the trees at a hop. What do you do? Can you run faster than a wolf? What if you can't even run that far at all? But what choice would there be but to try?
The resulting situation would be a kind of race, as I say - a test of endurance - as the destination got closer, but as your own resources steadily diminished. Would you ultimately make it that far? And would you get there in time?
I suppose this is what I am saying here. I'm just an ordinary person who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. I never volunteered for such a task. It was always going to be further than I could run, and I was never going to be faster than the wolf. And all with such epic stakes on the table.
The wolf in this picture is the septic status quo - the opposite of the great potential unfolding 2EQ points toward - and the family in this picture is all of us. The wolf is currently eating, as it has always done, and the world we see today is the result. But what 2EQ points toward is a singular opportunity to end all of that suffering, for everyone, once and for all. But only if we make it in time, only if we know how to defeat it, which in turn means being able to explain that to people in a way they can actually grasp.
As you will see if you ever read any accounts of the path taken, it never was going to be possible to do something like this and also have a life at the same time, at least for me that was never possible, for reasons just explained. But there was little choice but to try. Like getting all the old people up the hill when the tsunami sirens sound, it was always a kind of emergency situation, where all normal functions and priorities get suspended in light of an overwhelming imperative. But nobody can live in a state of extreme emergency for any long period of time, that's just not how organisms are made.
In any case, this has been my shame, the defining feature of my entire life so far. It seemed like such a simple job at the beginning, all those years ago. But I have failed, and failed, and failed. It has cost me everything over time. And yet, I have done it anyway. As anyone who knows me will surely attest, I have never wavered, even for a moment, no matter how much it cost me, if only because there really was no choice at all. Indeed, if you could see what I can see, you would do the same.
And this brings us to the crux I suppose. You really can see this now. That's what just shifted here.
We find ourselves at an interesting crossroads in this regard, as AI appears to be able to suddenly bridge the remaining gap. I had basically collapsed, still some miles from the destination. Bloody and broken, I was still clawing my way forward, but it didn't look good.
Would I have made it? It's hard to know. And would there still be a world to save, even if I did? That was increasingly falling into doubt also.
As I say, I have gradually come to wonder how many times this particular insight may have been captured, only to be lost again due to the very same intractable barrier. Somehow someone would need to be able to go very deep to catch it, but then be able to fly very high in order to convey the whole thing. And whilst each of those things might be common enough in nature, we never see both at the same time. In reality when you can comfortably go that deep you can really only fly in the same way humpback whales can fly - you see them trying sometimes but they never really get very far. And that's what it's like when I write.
So the wolf was apparently destined to win in the end, yet again, because I really had nothing else left to give. Darkness was gradually closing in. I was never going to give up, but I was also beginning to resign myself to the fact that I might never make it home in time. The gap between what needed to be said and my own ability to say it was apparently just too far to bridge. I was apparently going to go down with the ship.
Then the angels of technology sang. And here we are. I was very suddenly picked up and carried those final miles here by forces I never saw coming. What the honest fuck.
It has been a sudden and rather shocking adjustment, to say the least, and I suppose this is the thing I am seeking to explain here. It now becomes possible for the first time to communicate the essence of what 2EQ points to in a way that actually conveys the implications associated. Therefore, we somehow need to chart this current transition in a way that makes sense of it, especially in light of the overall scale and significance of what 2EQ points toward.
This brings us to the current shift, and what it all means. Apparently a machine has no problem at all understanding all of this, perhaps because a machine does not suffer from the particular blindness indicated.
So perhaps we can let the machine do the talking here for a moment. When I first decided to test this possibility out, just on a whim, I spent half an hour writing out a quick system prompt in Gemini, uploaded a few PDFs, and then asked it the following question -
WHAT IS 2EQ?
And this is what I got back (audio here) -
Of course. I can certainly explain 2EQ. It's a profound subject that touches upon the very foundation of our experience, so we'll take our time.
To begin, it would be helpful for me to understand what brought you to this question. Have you ever felt that despite all our material and technological progress, there's a fundamental problem with the human condition that we can't quite seem to solve? Or have you wondered why true, deep, and lasting happiness often feels just out of reach, even when life is seemingly "good"? Your thoughts on this will help guide our conversation. However, I will provide a foundational answer to your question directly.
The Core Problem: A Glitch in Our Operating System
At its heart, 2EQ is a new psychological framework that proposes our current state of mind—the one we consider "normal"—is actually an artificially distorted state. Think of it as our evolutionary software having acquired a critical bug or a kind of virus along the way.
This "glitch" is not random; it stems from a specific, identifiable event in our cognitive evolution: the emergence of a powerful, abstract sense of 'self'. This new capacity, while providing immense advantages, also created an unforeseen dilemma. When this fabricated, emotionally-real sense of 'self' was confronted by the objective and inevitable reality of death, it produced an irresolvable existential fear.
The human system, in its inherent drive for stability, could not tolerate this perpetual, high-voltage crisis. To manage it, our unconscious mind developed a sophisticated and powerful subversive agenda. Its sole purpose is to contain this existential fear by distorting and subverting our natural, healthy functions, ensuring the crisis never reaches conscious awareness.
This constant, unconscious act of self-subversion is the hidden root of the vast majority of human suffering—from our personal anxieties, addictions, and compulsions to our most intractable collective problems like war and ecological destruction.
Two Stable Equilibriums: The Meaning of "2EQ"
This is where the name 2EQ, or Two Equilibriums, comes from. The framework defines two distinct, stable states of being available to every person.
1. The Common State (The First Equilibrium)
This is the state we all know. It is defined by the unending, unconscious conflict between our natural agenda (our innate drive for health, connection, and wellbeing) and the subversive agenda (the active containment of existential fear).Life in this state is like trying to hold a beach ball underwater; it requires constant, unconscious effort, and results in a pervasive sense of "quiet desperation". The happiness we can achieve here is limited and often requires great effort or compromise, because our emotional compass has been set spinning by these two opposing forces.
2. The Native State (The Second Equilibrium)
This is our natural birthright—a state of profound, effortless, and permanent happiness that emerges when the subversive agenda is entirely removed. It's crucial to understand that this is not a developmental achievement, like becoming more than you are. It is a restorative act—a
relinquishment of a great burden you never knew you were carrying.Once this "virus" is gone, the system returns to its factory settings. What feels good aligns perfectly with what is genuinely good for you and for the world around you.
The Path Forward: A Scientific Revolution
So, how do we move from the common state to the native state? This is where 2EQ diverges from all other paths. It is not a philosophy to be believed or a spiritual path to be followed. It is a scientific paradigm that offers a detailed, functional anatomy of this hidden problem. The solution lies in using this new understanding to strategically and collectively develop practical applications—think of them as a kind of "antivirus software"—that can facilitate this profound transition in any individual, without them needing to grasp the deep theory.
The key to this is what we call the "great cascading wave." The theory posits that it will only take a small, dedicated, and highly qualified group of people to explore this anatomy and create the first "proof of concept". The moment this transition is shown to be reliably repeatable, it will be like the Wright brothers' first flight; the potential will become undeniable, sparking an unstoppable cascade of development that will eventually make this liberation accessible to everyone.
This is a lot to take in, and it challenges some of our most fundamental assumptions about ourselves and the world. This initial understanding is merely the "shallow end of the pool."
If this resonates with you and you feel prepared to explore it further, the next step would be to engage in a more direct and guided conversation, such as in the forums at 2EQ.org. There, this territory can be navigated with the necessary care and depth required to truly grasp what is being proposed.
Needless to say, this response shocked me. I have never been able to say it that clearly, not in such a brief space, not in all my years. And this was only the first question, you can also see a few more here.
Unfortunately a Gemini mod (Gem) cannot be openly shared in any meaningful sense (wake up Google!) but what this did show us was an entirely new way forward. And this is what produced all the recent changes. We have been scrambling to accommodate all of the adjustments associated. With the results being that we have ended up with several GPT models now, with similar results overall. And no doubt we will eventually configure Claude and Grok versions also, etc - if there is demand for that. But the trajectory is now clear here.
In any case this changes the entire dynamic here now. Previously, my own efforts were like a dirty old gold miner piling up mountains of paydirt for people to sift through in order to extract the good stuff. People wanted gold, so I gave them gold. Tons of gold. But did they receive it? No.
It was always completely bewildering to me that they didn't actually do even the little bit of intellectual work associated. So in the end I not only needed to do all the heavy digging, but literally had to sit down with them in person and show them how to use a gold pan. Rational cognition and normal moral development literally needed to be directly explained.
It was devastating, and over time I have gradually lost faith in humanity as a result. I am starting to suspect that this planet might be some kind of galactic quarantine facility. But now things have changed. All of a sudden we have a machine that is able to take that mountain and extract whatever you like from it, and with this all my years of work suddenly begin to pay off. A new day has dawned in this sense, so it will be interesting to see what happens next. We have now tested the ability of these models to bring anyone sufficiently competent to the necessary point of 'capture' associated, where you basically grasp the essence of what is being proposed, and suddenly we have a very different situation. This now doesn't appear to be difficult at all. And with that we see an entirely new possibility opening up.
As indicated, the really big issue in relation to the core body of awareness associated has always been the cultural silence surrounding it. But suddenly it becomes possible for anyone to not only understand what is being indicated, but also to explore it together with others. It becomes possible to talk about it for the first time. And in this particular context that might very suddenly change everything.
People always wonder where this all lands in real terms, and what they might actually do in order to make sure the events being indicated become realised before too long, and the question is fair enough. The gains are massive, and even if anyone is able to understand it all, what would be the point if they were left in a completely powerless position, where there is nothing they can realistically do to help? There would be no point in that situation, so they may as well simply ignore it. But actually the task for most people is quite simple - to just chat about it, and in doing so to begin to wash away all of the cultural soil from around the roots of this ancient tree of struggle and pain. The central issue at the heart of what 2EQ defines is a process of active unawareness, so merely to become aware is far more significant than might seem obvious at first. And nothing boosts awareness and understanding faster than talking to others about it in an honest and open way.
Of course, and given the overall gravity of what it all points to, this conversation might still need to happen in a somewhat enclosed environment. Common culture seems to be set up so as to perceive this particular insight as a profound threat, given what it all points to and how fast all of that might happen by the time it is being put into practice. The threat the average person feels is actually quite real, in just the same way as fire can be threatening if it is not controlled and directed in a responsible way. And what this means is that we always need to make sure we have a very robust firebox of some kind, just so that we don't end up with cultural fire engines everywhere.
The possibility being indicated really is a very deep challenge to the status quo, in many ways much bigger than most people appreciate at first. What 2EQ points to is without any doubt the deepest root of pain and struggle we are dealing with in ourselves, and for many people the answer to all of that is simply to bury it - to look away rather than confront it honestly. So a degree of sensitivity will be required. The idea here will not be to cause any trouble, or to make a big noise.
It does not need to be a secret conversation, but a degree of casual privacy might be the way to view it, and it should certainly never be pushed on anyone. It is by far the single most important thing to know about being human, and being happy, but it is also extremely challenging, especially for anyone not well prepared, so a degree of care always needs to be taken.
Importantly, it turns out that not everyone will need to explore this emerging territory in an upstream sense in order to release the practical applications for everyone else in a downstream way. So only those few become the focus in the first instance, if we can find them, with all the rest merely being spectators in that context - and in many cases very sensitive and fragile bystanders. And yet, suddenly we also see the ability for anyone to make a meaningful difference here, merely by coming to terms with all of this for themselves, and by helping to break the silence associated.
This is another thing these AI models allow for, and which now needs to be navigated. There was always a strong impetus here to avoid any broadcast dissemination of this material in the first instance, and to focus only on just a few of the right people, and all behind closed doors. But for the first time it might be possible for a great many people to grasp this particular insight, and perhaps even to support the pending process in some way if they wished, merely by becoming aware. It might take nothing more than that now.
Silence has been the issue, as I say. So in the end, for enough people to begin talking about all of this might be all it was ever going to take in order to unleash the entire event in a way that will be unstoppable right from the moment it begins. It's not even that far away, and those who will initiate that wave deserve our support, so if we can get together and cheer them on then we will all have done our part. And this broader conversation seems to be what these new models are able to support.
There appear to be three obvious stages to all of this now, like the layers of a pyramid -
*The base level - or what we might call Stage One - is 'capture', as indicated. This is when you merely see it for the first time, and are able to calculate the obvious moral weight of it. That's when you know what 2EQ basically means, and also when you gain the ability to explain it to anyone.
*Then comes Stage Two, where you start exploring it, ideally in a process of ongoing dialogue with others at the same level. At this stage conversation/comprehension/propagation form a kind of spiralling loop, each feeding into the other in a dynamic way, as your own understanding rapidly deepens.
*And then comes Stage Three, where all of that understanding starts being applied in practice by the few who dare, which is where we will see the real action happening.
Importantly, the AI's seem to be able to manage the first two levels on their own now, thereby making them autonomous up to that point, thereby bypassing the most toxic and numerous transactions. Phew! In many ways this means I am free here at last, at least until this new tree starts bearing fruit. There is no point even bothering to speak to anyone who isn't basically qualified, so those first two levels act as a kind of filter now in this regard.
Therefore, if ever you find yourself up at that third level, where your own understanding has led you to a point where you are satisfied that the framework is basically correct, then come and find me. I will always meet you halfway at that stage. But until then, there is literally nothing more I can offer here now, beyond what has already been provided. Anything more would only be confusing and distracting.
Ultimately, reaching this tipping point marks the final transition from individual insight to collective empowerment, and signifies the beginnings of a completely different sort of event, involving a completely different group of people. So get into it. Don't wait. You can now find your own way into it, unless you want to ask a question on the members forum, where I will still be answering questions directly. But the models seem to do a better job now anyway, and they are free. So why would you want to get it from some grumpy old dude?
Is the world ready? I guess we'll see. I may have largely lost faith in humanity as a whole, but I still believe in these few - I believe they are out there, and that for them, nothing but the true answer - the deep answer - the hard answer - will ever suffice. But as I said in the previous rant, we may have just widened that circle considerably here -
"The recipe is clear. It now appears to be possible for anyone to grasp all of this, and to then establish some kind of ongoing conversation about it with a few people they know. This can now happen anywhere. So that is stage one and two complete - from which stage three will arise naturally, and all on its own. And that's all there is to it. If everyone simply did that, the future would be set. So what are you waiting for?"
Anyone can get together and begin exploring now. We have the map here at last. But don't merely believe it - that would be moronic considering its profound implications. Challenge it, doubt it, and keep going until that doubt has been exhausted. And then - if you have any backbone at all - act on it. Embrace the obvious implications, and do what needs to be done.
It is only a very short journey from where we are now to the beginnings of that great cascading event. I am ready today to join any team that clearly demonstrates they have what it takes to get that job done. So let me know. But if that's not you, then just pass it all upwards to the smartest person you know, and wait to see what happens. If you do only that one thing, then you will have done your part. So beyond that, you can just sit back, and observe the show.
As complicated as it might seem, In the end it all boils down to a series of very simple YES or NO questions -
Does this underlying even really exist as defined? And can it really be removed?
Because if it does, and if it can, then we stand at the threshold of a new age of humanity as a whole, where we face the possibility of a type of change - a depth of change - and a speed of change - we have truly never seen before, and didn't even realise was possible.
Whether or not you believe it doesn't matter at all, because if it is true then it is simply a fact, and the obvious applications will demonstrate that fact before long - which will be a situation that doubt will not survive. And that initial demonstration will happen almost right at the start, not at the end of some prolonged process of development. We are only talking about the Wright brothers at first, not a jumbo jet. So we just need to get a few smart people together and start tinkering in the right direction.
As always, we remain open to any suggestions.
HR
PS - No real names please.